Pages

Showing posts with label Optimum Performance Training. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Optimum Performance Training. Show all posts

#OutsideTheBox 2014 Fitness Competition and Education Seminar, August 29th-31st



Total number of competitors: 24 men, 24 women

Minimum performance standards for entry:
Men - 205lb Clean and Jerk, 335lb Deadlift, 10 chest to bar (not strict)
Women - 135lb Clean and Jerk, 225lb Deadlift, 10 pull-up (not strict)

Spectators are free to come and watch the event and education sessions. 

Current Weekend Layout (details are not yet finalized, subject to change)
Friday, the 29th
4 pm - 5 pm - Introduction and presentation by Michael FitzGerald

5:30 pm - 7 pm - Event 1 - Clean and Jerk based (full squat required)


6 pm - 8 pm - Event 2 - Dogsled/Prowler based - this will be work:rest style, more than one effort


Saturday, the 30th
9:30 am - 11 am @ Foothills Tracks - Event 3 - Running


2 pm - 3 pm - Event 4 @ CrossFit AI South - Mixed Modal - full effort/sprint style


3:15 pm - 4 pm @ CrossFit AI South - Presentation by Kevin Kwan

4 pm - 4:45 pm @ CrossFit AI South - Presentation by Bryan Myles

5:15 pm - 7:30 pm - Event 5 - Mixed Modal Aerobic Power/Repeatability
--work:rest scenario
--Concept 2 Rower and Assault AirBike and Double Unders will be included



Sunday, the 31st
8 am - 9 am - Presentation by Mike Kesthely of Dynamic Nutrition 

9:30 am - 11 am - Event 6 - Deadlift based

11 am - 11:30 am - Event 7 - Jumping (1 effort only)


11:30 am - 12:30 pm - Q&A with Presentors from the weekend

1 pm - 3 pm - Event 8 - Long Chipper (Running to start the event)
- the time cap on this event will be at least 30 minutes.
- only the top competitors will compete in this event, exact numbers TBA


3 pm - 3:30 pm - Awards (TBA)  and Acknowledgements


Throwdown Series - Event Review for October 2012

I was asked by two of my clients, David Zeff and Chris Berry, to design the workouts for the last Throwdown Series, as well as the current one. David and Chris run the event.

Overall, the event was meant to be completed within a 60-75 minute time frame, and therefore was not meant to utilize all possibilities with event selection. As well, all modalities had to be easily accessible to all participants based on what most facilities would have (i.e. no Airdynes). Here is a short breakdown of my thought process as well as the science involved in the layout. Any feedback is much appreciated (place in comments below).

Event 1 - 3RM Hang Snatch
Modality - 1
Energy System tested - ATP/CP
Characteristics - speed, strength, power, flexibility, technical efficiency, grip strength
Thoughts:
- overall, just a variation on testing the ATP/CP system.
- could be either a power snatch, full squat, or split (no knee touch).
- competitors must be able to control the load from overhead, back to hips, and not let bar go below knee caps at any point.
- some of the more technically efficient, and truly powerful individuals, will be limited by the fact they have to bring the weight back to the hips under control.
- using a 3RM instead of 1RM, favours individuals with less neuromuscular efficiency to a certain extent (i.e. those they perform well with multiple reps close to their 1RM's).
- from the hang simplifies the movement, and will allow competitors to truly express hip power as the hang is less technically advanced than from the floor.
- involves a certain amount of skill adaptation, if unfamiliar with doing heavy hang snatches, without the use of straps, or dropping the bar.

(my score = 165lb)

Event 2 - Thruster/Row
Modalities - 2
Energy System tested - Anaerobic Lactate Endurance
Characteristics - speed of movement, technical efficiency, mental fortitude, knowing oneself
Thoughts:
- was meant to be a test of Anaerobic Lactate Endurance (i.e. for those that were able to push hard on the thrusters and get them done quickly and unbroken + went hard on the row and pushed for a top time).
- could also have been Aerobic Power (i.e. strong competitor that thrusters were not too difficult + they did not go hard on the Row, a.k.a. performed much below their potential on the event).
- could also have been CP Stamina + Aerobic Power (i.e. competitor that had to break the thrusters several times meaning they were not working for a significant time duration, and did not push the row hard enough, or were unable to due to the leg fatigue).
- could also have been CP Stamina + Anaerobic Lactate Endurance (i.e. competitor had to break the thrusters several times, but pushed hard on the row and made it hurt).
- I designed it, trying to have somewhat of a "fair" event for all sizes of individuals, thinking that a taller individual should be slightly slower on the thrusters and should be slightly faster on the rower. Does it balance out? I don't know. Looking forward to the results to be posted.
- Speed of movement is imperative. For those that are able to do the thrusters unbroken, they should be pushing hard to shave as many seconds off of those 30 reps as possible, demonstrating they possess speed and power.
- the Row! If done right, this event sucks. If done incorrectly, it is not too bad. The top competitors should be doing the event under 2:30 min.
(My score = 2:32)

Event 3 - 5 roundER
Modalities - 3
Energy System tested - Aerobic Power
Characteristics - recovery between events, speed of movement, technical efficiency, knowing oneself/pace accordingly.
Thoughts:
- event was meant to be high/fast turnover and sustainable event for 8-12 minutes. This is an event that generally allows most competitors to increase the pace if they want to and allows them to slow down as needed, all while taking very little rest. Meaning, the event is adjustable based on how much pain you want to go through (i.e. think of a 10 min Row for max meters OR AMRAP Cals on an Airdyne in 10 minutes...the better you want to do, the more it is going to hurt).
- I designed it to reward the individual that does no stop moving, performs the movements technically well and rapidly, and displays sustainability and true aerobic power.
- the burpee standard will be different for many people, and quickly adapting to a new standard is necessary in this event, or the time per rep on the burpees will be too slow.
- if event 2 for a competitor is a true lactate endurance event, then those that possess a good aerobic system will recover sufficiently and will also succeed in event 3. If this same competitor does NOT possess a good aerobic system, they will not be able to clear the lactate during that short of a recovery time and then be able to perform in a high aerobic environment for 8-12 minutes in event 3 (maybe they will, but it will be VERY uncomfortable the entire time). What will most likely happen is they will get 1 or 2 rounds into this event, and will have to begin taking multiple breaks. People in this situation NEED to train their aerobic system appropriately throughout the year to make ANY reasonable progress. Otherwise, they will continually bump up against this "wall" in events like this again and again.
(My score - 8:53...I missed 1 burpee in round 1, so I figure a 4 sec penalty is sufficient. Did an extra clean and wall ball in there as well. Event 2 ruined my brain function. I would also like to thank my Aussie camera man for the shaky video...he did his best!)

(Throwdown Series going down in Calgary @ our facility)

Questions of Fitness

What is your definition of fitness? Do you agree with CrossFit? Or, do you agree with another fitness body or organization? Or, do you have your own idea or theory? What constitutes a legitimate definition? I will be presenting (more in-depth) on this topic at the OPTathalon in San Diego in October.  But, for now, let's just get a little bit into this without going overboard. Comments/discussions are welcomed.

I imagine most of my readers would be those that are engaged in CrossFit or at least know enough about it to get the gist of my blog posts. So, we will say that everyone (I am exaggerating, or at least I hope I am) reading this agrees with CrossFit and their definition of fitness, as "work capacity, across broad time, and modal domains (WCBTMD)".

Here I am trying to outline a simple way for you to understand where your own personal definition of fitness may sit in the evolution of definitions.

First (Basic) Order Definition - "To complete a task"
* Not specific (too broad of a scope). If the scope of the definition is too broad, then it is useless and infinite.
* Not directive and descriptive (i.e. does not provide direction as to how to go about testing this as a legitimate theory. It does not provide any insight as to what the "nuts and bolts" are, so to speak...what makes up fitness?)
* Universally understood and appreciated (i.e. farmer working in the field on their crop, or shovelling your driveway if needed, CrossFit Games, OPTathalon, or whatever).

Second Order Definition - "WCBTMD"
* Not specific (too broad of a scope). Characteristics of what they consider makes up fitness ("the 10 components of fitness" is important, but does not limit the scope as any single thing (i.e. typing on a keyboard, walking your dog) can be useful on this scale of 10 components.
* Somewhat directive and descriptive (does provide insight into the ways in which fitness can be tested, but does not go into great detail. There is substance to the definition, and it does give more insight about the subject of fitness and what it is).
* Less understood and less appreciated than the 1st Order definition (inherent as the intricacy of the definition increases.)

Third (Intricate) Order Definition - to be determined
* Must be specific. Here are just some of the "little things that must be discussed and considered".
- what are the "nuts and bolts" of fitness? what is the over-riding guide? energy systems? 
- should characteristics like agility, balance, co-ordination, etc. be considered useful in designing appropriate testing? or are they merely correlative of appropriate testing and of the top athletes? 
- which modalities are appropriate and suitable for testing and which are only appropriate and suitable for training? are certain modalities more important and valid than others in testing (i.e. running, clean and jerks, deadlifting, burpees vs. sit-ups, step-ups, turkish get-ups, back extensions)?
- which scoring system has to be adopted universally such that testing can be considered legitimate and a comparison between years can be made?
- should weight and height ever be considered, or not?
- should a judge be necessary? how much of a factor should judging be? who is qualified to judge? are modalities selected with judging capability and accuracy in mind (how much judging capacity does running and rowing require? how much judging capacity do kettlebell swings require?
- can we determine the validity and repeatability of said test/event?
*Must provide direction and be descriptive.
- should it outline appropriate ways (i.e. workouts, events, modalities) to administer testing? 
- who determines that the testing is appropriate and suitable to be able to say it is testing an aspect of fitness? Remember for the 1st and 2nd Order definition, anything can be considered a test of fitness as they are too broad in scope.
- should human physiology be considered into what makes up an entire testing event (i.e. an entire competition)? how many energy systems will be considered in testing? on what basis? how many events per energy system shall be utilized?
- are their yearly reviews, conferences, and roundtable discussions to try to improve our understanding of the definition.

All I really want people/readers to get from this brief exercise is to think more deeply about the thing we all love so dearly...Fitness! Without discussion and reasoning, we will get no where.

(James - photo courtesy of Focus Sisters Photography)

(Michael - photo courtesy of Focus Sisters Photography)

Reebok CrossFit Games 2012 - Results (Week 1)


I am so happy to have this picture displayed on my blog. I am very proud of how my individual athletes did this past weekend in the Canada West, South Central, and South East Regionals. All 7 of us Optimum Performance Training athletes in Canada West made it to the 6th event of the weekend - no cuts (7 competitors out of 36 total = about 20%)! Too bad none of us could grad a top 2 finish.

Canada West (picture displayed above) - from left to right:
Men
David Mullback - 16th place
DeeJay Wickham - 5th place
Me - 7th place
Fraser O'Neill - 8th place
Aaron Chetek - 18th place

Women
Lauren Pryor - 16th place
Jessica Tillapaugh - 10th place

South Central
Men
Michael McElroy - 16th place

South East
Men
Jake Naumcheff - 22nd place

I have to say the weekend was very enjoyable for me. As an athlete, a coach, and a spectator. Great to watch all the amazing performances put in by the athletes, there were too many to mention here in this post. Side note - from my experience (personally), the judging was consistent and fair. Hope that trend continues into the next 4 weeks of Regional competition.

Best of luck to all that have yet to compete.

Reebok CrossFit Games 2012 - The Regionals

Here is my opinion on the upcoming Regional events. I compete in the Canada West Regional this weekend (April 27-29th), so I may have some different thoughts afterwards.

Event # 1 - "Diane"
1) Modalities - 2
2) Energy System Tested (based on the top competitors) - CP Stamina/Capacity
3) Thoughts:
- this is a classic CrossFit workout. I remember watching a video of Brett Marshall (CrossFit Calgary) from many many moons ago absolutely destroying this workout. I wonder if anyone will beat his time of sub 2 min during the next few weekends?
this was my best performance on Diane, way back in September 2009...shortly after the 2009 CrossFit Games. My feet were too wide (why that matters I still don't know), my hands were too wide (probably 3-4" wider than the limit for the HSPU's in the Regionals 2012), and I was wearing a belt (that would be an automatic 30 second penalty now that I think about it).
- this is not a workout in favour of someone that is heavy and tall (i.e. DeeJay Wickham)
- for the top Male/Female competitors - the entire workout is centred around the HSPU's. The deadlift will only really dictate positioning in standings for people that are able to blaze through the HSPU's unbroken, thereby creating a scenario which makes the breaks between sets of Deadlifts quite short, thereby making them more challenging.
- for most Female competitors - this might as well be 45 HSPU's for time (for the most part). Only a small percentage (maybe < 20%) females will have some issues with doing the Deadlifts unbroken. And, yes, the Deadlifts will add some fatigue to the upper body/core which does play a part in the HSPU's, but it is not going to be that important. I really dislike the fact that females have to complete the 21 HSPU's in order to advance onward in the competition, very disappointing. These individuals will not take one of the top two spots in my Regional, so I don't know what the issue is. I hope all the females squeak out the round of 21 so they are able to continue. Setting this standard places way too much emphasis on the upper body relative strength (body weight/height vs. strength) of the Female competitors (the Male competitors will likely not be affected by this, for the most part).

Event # 2 - "The Zone 1 Row"
1) Modalities - 3
2) Energy System Tested (based on the top competitors) - CP Stamina/Capacity with a splash of Aerobic System
3) Thoughts:
- poor layout to the workout. Placing the 2000m Row at the start of the workout makes no sense to me, as it takes away 2 things - 1) potentiation of events, and 2) pain (i.e. aerobic power). But, at least everyone will have completed a decent warm-up prior to starting the pistols! I will be rowing the 2000m at a 1:55 ish/500m pace (give or take), meaning that my heart rate will not even approach 85% max, meaning the my cardiac output will be very low, meaning that this is not a test of the aerobic system.
- I believe a slight change in the design would yield more useful results. For example: start the workout with the hang cleans. Make it an AMRAP in 2-5 mins at that weight if you wish. Then AMRAP Pistols in 2-5 mins. Then Row 2000m for time.  At least this way the 2000m Row means something, and being proficient at Pistols means something as well. Score the events individually, or combine, or whatever.
- the Hang Cleans will be the determining factor in the workout for everyone, unless you are very slow at the Pistols due to ankle flexibility, injury to the knee, etc., or your Rower is broken.
- again setting the standard of having to complete the 10 Hang Cleans in order to move on makes no sense to me and will end individuals' weekends' too early.
- for people that have long thigh bones (i.e. femur), and limited ankle flexibility, you had better bring some high heel shoes to get the pistols done...or plan on doing pistols on your toes (read: knee/hip injury).
- I like the use of a single leg movement in testing, as proficiency in double leg and single leg movements is a missing link in many of the people I come across.

Event # 3 - "DB Power Snatch and Yogging"
1) Modalities - 2
2) Energy System Tested (based on the top competitors) - CP Stamina/Capacity with a splash of Aerobic System
3) Thoughts:
- where can I buy a 100lb DB?
- producing power with the hips and finishing with a single arm is a nice addition to competition (like a softball throw).
- receiving the DB overhead is going to be really challenging for many people (myself included).
- the movement standard weight for the Power Snatch is too slow to make the workout very taxing to the lactate or aerobic system for most (relative to its true potential).
- I will be on the lookout for people that are sprinting during this event as it will be non-existant (outside of the last dash during round 4).
- I posted about this on Facebook a few weeks ago, stating that I believe without testing running in a competition, you cannot truly test fitness. This event is not a test of running, in case you were wondering. If you will always test for a max lift in a competition, then you should always test for a run of some sorts (I would suggest distance has to total at least 1600m to balance things out). Running seems very simple or boring, but it is very revealing of any energy system you choose to test and is always valid/repeatable/measurable.
- again, not a fan of cutting people who cannot finish the first round of the DB Power Snatch/Run. I sincerely hope everyone makes it though the first round.

Event # 4 - "Ouch"
1) Modalities - 5
2) Energy System Tested (based on the top competitors) - I don't know. There will be lots of breathing/muscular endurance needed and lots of fractions of reps (i.e. CP Stamina/Capacity).
3) Thoughts:
- classic CrossFit chipper/beatdown
- most important thing for competitors to realize is that they cannot finish the workout in 10 minutes, and should not attempt to do so, if they do it will end up as a DNF or a very painful last half of the workout. Strategy, proper resting, and recovery of shoulders/quads will be very important in this one.
- this event will test how much discomfort you can put up with while breathing your ass off.
- there will be too many breaks during the event to call it a true aerobic test, but it will be close for some of the elite competitors as they will not be breaking too often.

Event # 5 - "Double Under/Snatch"
1) Modalities - 2
2) Energy System Tested - CP Capacity (this is pretty much a true test of the ATP/CP system, if not for the double unders)
3) Thoughts:
- the double unders add a nice adaptability component. For people getting to the higher loads of 225+, you will have done a fair number of double unders prior to these lifts which can mess with the tech/timing of the Snatch
- your shoulders/low back/quads will likely be quite tender prior to this event, due to the Friday and Saturday events. This may or may not play a vital role in your max effort attempts. However, from my previous experiences in competitions, it will not cause much issue for most people, as adrenaline/cortisol is a wonderful this during competition (not so much for the following week when you don't have any and have trouble lifting your head off the pillow in the morning).
- why not do this event first? If you want test true potential of someone's CP/ATP system, place it first in the weekend. Or, place it earlier in the competition before people are too beat up.

Event # 6 - "The Finale"
1) Modalities - 6
2) Energy System Tested - the 3 rounds of DL/MU's will be CP Stamina/Capacity, after that it will be an aerobic power test
3) Thoughts:
- I think the heavy DL in this event is overkill on the weightlifting and your precious lumbar vertebrae/discs.
- for the numerous females that are not proficient at MU's, the moderate/heavy DL will not help with this. As the DL will likely heavily fatigue the lats/arms making the MU reps that much harder for them.
- It will be key to not smash your grip by pushing too hard on the DL's or the MU's as the toes to bar, farmers walks, and last set of MU's will be tough on the grip.

Limitations of the Regional workouts
- it is only one weekend, and it can't be expected that the events chosen by CrossFit would include every potential modality as equipment shipping/transport/set-up/take down cannot be extreme. I will just discuss what this may be missing.
- each Regional has to have the same workouts, meaning that all event host centres have to have all necessary accommodations, which will again limit workout options (i.e. running, swimming, climbing, etc.).
- the shoulder girdle (more specifically the GH Joint) will once again be devastated by the end of the weekend, hopefully their will not be too many injuries.
- the lumbar vertebrae/musculature will also be devastated by the end of the weekend. Again, hope there are not too many injuries.
- there is no test of Aerobic Capacity/Aerobic Power or Aerobic Endurance (this is where running should come in).
- running is not included in the event, yogging is.
- there is no test of the Anaerobic Lactate (or Anaerobic Glycolytic) system (i.e. something really hard) as all the events are too slow, and hence, not powerful for a sufficient time frame.
- there is no test of Squatting Strength (high rep squatting is not a test of strength, and will not determine who is best at squatting).
- there is no test of Bending Strength, i.e. Deadlift (high rep bending movements are not equivalent to 1RM's).
- there is no test of Upper Body Pulling or Pressing Strength. I loved that their was a Chin-up test in the Games last year...very cool, as was the softball throw. Again, high rep movements do not qualify as a test of strength).
- 5 out of the 6 events include some kind of moderate/heavy bending movement, that is a lot of a single movement pattern. Too much?
- 4 out of the 6 events include some kind of moderate/heavy overhead pressing/lockout, that is a lot for those rotator cuffs to handle in 3 days. Thoughts?
- why is the criteria for being cut from an event (i.e. not finishing the HSPU's/Clean's/DB Snatches/etc.) always based on CP ability. When will people be cut from an event due to inability in their anaerobic glycolytic/anaerobic lactic (i.e. row 500m in a certain time relative to your body weight) or due to an inability in aerobic power (i.e. run 1600m under 7 min for males, under 8 mins for females). This is a very simple question to ask, as well as a very simple thing to test for. For the people spending a lot of money to go to these events, at least tell them before they make travel arrangements and pay their registration fee that if you cannot do the following things: A, B, C, D...then you probably shouldn't bother coming.
- in my opinion, CrossFit is testing their definition of fitness, and who is fit. Which is fine as this is what I signed up for. This is not how I would design a competition to find who is fittest, as clearly my biases/definition are not the same as CrossFit's.
- I believe that you should be able to test for the fittest without having to leverage the individual's body/health against it. At what point does volume during a weekend competition move from necessary to borderline harmful? I believe that it speaks to the validity and efficiency of the tests implored to be able to find your answer in the simplest and least harmful way possible. Critics of my belief may say "you should be able to do that much work if you are to be called the fittest, or "that is CrossFit", or what have you. Maybe they are right. But, I say that is being unaware of the possibilities. Possibilities that have yet to be explored.
- comments are welcome.

All the best to each and every competitor. Full effort, full victory.

CrossFit Open Update - March 12th, 2012

Here is my view on Open 12.3 of 2012 Reebok CrossFit Games.

Event # 3 - Weight/Gymnastic Triplet:
1) Time limit: 18 minutes
2) Modalities: 3
3) Energy System Tested (based on top competitors): Aerobic Power/Capacity
4) Thoughts:
- this was a great workout to test what CrossFit is looking for. Plus, it was a good design of movements.
- what is truly required of the top competitors in CrossFit is the ability to combine high muscular endurance with high aerobic capacity. The athletes' muscular endurance capability must be intact from low loads through to relatively higher loads if they are to be a true competitor in CrossFit (i.e. you can't only be good @ 65lbs, or vice versa @ 185lbs). 
- as per my previous posts, I believe this workout should be limited by muscular endurance, not breathing, for the elite competitors. This is sometimes tough to assess on your own. But, if muscular endurance was not the limiting factor, then extra (low intensity single modality - run, row, airdyne, swim, etc) MAP training per week is in order to sure up this issue either before Regionals, before the Games, or right now if the individual either will not make it to Regionals or does not plan on competing past the Open and has goals for next year. Without continued direct training for this aspect, things will not improve at the rate they could.
- if muscular endurance is the limiting factor, then smart training prescriptions are in order as it is VERY EASY to overdue this as ego may get in the way (i.e. 100 chin-ups every day to make your chin-up endurance better). I hope you can all see the illogical strategy here. The problem magnifies when you have someone that weighs 225lbs vs. 155lbs...how would you design training to improve the muscular endurance ability for each of these people such that you get the dose response from the training (i.e. not too much and not too little) without overtraining that one movement/muscle group - leading to injury and down time. This is one simple example of why individualized training is THE only way to achieve your true potential as an athlete.
- My belief/bias is that these competitions place too much importance on overhead movements (i.e. chin-ups/muscle-ups/hspu/ohs/push press/etc.) thereby limiting the true power output of the athlete over a given time frame, as power production/sustainability is much greater from the shoulders down vs. the shoulders up. This is NOT to say overhead movements should not be tested, they have to be. However, I believe they are tested too often. As a side note, for a sport looking for longevity (or so I assume), the shoulder girdle (specifically GH and AC joints) will likely not last for 10 years in this sport without injury as the loading per session/week/month is likely much greater than the capacity for that area to recover over time. Let's not even mention the elbow, as that is another can of worms.
- as I said, for the top competitors, this was a test of Aerobic Power/Capacity. However, for many of the individuals the workout quickly became a test of the Creatine Phosphate energy system (CP stamina/battery) as either the 75lb or 115lb barbell became too tough to overcome, requiring substantial breaks, or the 9 toes to bar felt more like strict chin-ups in their effort and speed. When this happens, your body will require greater % of recovery of ATP in the relevant musculature prior to you being able to even make another rep, this is a much different scenario than someone that made 450+ reps as there were basically little/no breaks at any point, and aerobic ATP production is likely sufficient to continue their effort at their current % of effort/intensity.

CrossFit Open Update - March 6th, 2012

Here is my view on the first 2 events of the 2012 Reebok CrossFit Games: "The Open".

Event # 1 - Burpee mania:
1) Time limit: 7 minutes
2) Modalities: 1
3) Energy System Tested (based on top competitors): Aerobic Power/Capacity
4) Thoughts:
- I thought it was great test. Straight to the point, and painful. It will truly test the aerobic capacity requirements of the CrossFitter. Meaning, high breathing/cardiac output, no breaks, and accumulate muscular fatigue as the event goes on in time.
- It will expose the weakness of an athlete not having enough muscular endurance to challenge their aerobic system, or vice versa. In my case, my muscular endurance (upper body horizontal pushing musculature and quads) was not good enough to challenge my aerobic system (as I was never short of breath), and I would say this is the same for many competitors. OR, the other scenario for people is that they can keep going (muscular endurance is not the limiting factor) but they cannot breath well enough to sustain their effort (i.e. out of breath). In my view, this is the WORST scenario as your breathing/cardiac/respiratory system should be humming along at this time of the year leading in the Reebok CrossFit Games season, and your performance should be limited by your muscular ability to sustain your efforts in these types of CrossFit testers.
- One important aspect to this test is the competitor knowing how to best run their engine. Meaning, knowing how and when to push the speed of reps/min, when to back off slightly, and to be able to gauge intensity in their heads (yes, even within 2% ranges of intensity for that day...it does happen for experienced competitors/trainees) as they are moving through the 7 minutes such that they finish with the best performance possible for them, knowing that given the day, the test, and their ability they could not have done better (that is tough to know when doing a test for the first time, but again, the intensity meter in your head becomes vitally important) w.
- I believe that single modality testing is limited, but is necessary to truly have a valid/reliable/repeatable test. The more modalities included, the great the difficulty to have a valid/reliable/repeatable test. You have to start somewhere!
- This test was obviously favouring a shorter, lighter person.
- I believe the results of 69,000 competitors would likely be exactly opposite if the test was a 2,000m Row, simply based on body size. Those who stand out from this trend, would be the outliers and therefore statistics would predict them to perform best in other tests (i.e. big guys, 5'10" and greater/200lbs and greater, getting over 120 + reps would likely be considered as an example).

Event # 2 - Snatch mania:
1) Time limit: 10 minutes
2) Modalities: 1
3) Energy System Tested (based on top competitors): Creatine Phosphate Stamina/Capacity (CP recovery ability)
4) Thoughts:
- I thought it was a great test of this energy system. Again, works well to test the needs of the CrossFit competitor (ability to work @ high % of effort compared to their 1RM's, take very short rests, and go again). I am sure there are as many opinions about what people didn't like about this event as there were people that competed in the event (so roughly, 69,000). My opinion was that the weight jumps were too far apart and too many reps at the same weight, therefore creating a lot of ties on the leader board (ties are bound to happen in every event with 69,000 competitors, it is simple probability).
- One great aspect to this test was that it challenged people to adapt to the new weight of the bar, under fatigue. This is where I believe skill acquisition became important, as a 165lb snatch or 210lb snatch does not feel the same when it is preceded by 30 snatches @ 75lb, and 30 snatches @ 135lb. I liked that aspect. In my facility I had a few guys excel with this added challenge, and a few guys have a tough time adapting (even though they could snatch much more than was on the bar).
- Obviously for some of the guys that made it above 60+ reps, muscular endurance would likely limit performance in some competitors (my guess would be either shoulders or lower back). But, if muscular endurance limits performance on this, that is a sign that you need to improve that areas endurance if you truly wish to make it to the elite levels.
- This test favoured a stronger/powerful person, this person on average is likely larger than the person who did the best on Event # 1. So, it did attempt to balance out Event # 1.
- Height makes a big difference here - shorter distance, shorter moment arms (i.e. levers), less time per rep, less time under tension per rep, etc.

Bring on the rest of The Open!

Good luck, all.

My "Open" Competitors

I have been talking with my clients, peers, and colleagues as of late regarding the upcoming CrossFit season. Lots of discussion about who are my "top" competitors or who maybe "Games bound". I think that is unfair to discuss, as each of my individual coaching clients have their own goals and abilities. But, for the ones that are going to compete this year, here is a little shout out to each of them.

I use the word "Open" for 2 reasons.  First, the CrossFit Open is the starting point. Second, to describe these people with one general term, because it does truly take an open person to let go of all attachment, to hand over the reigns, and let themselves be guided. I am very grateful that these people are allowing me to guide them in their journey. As they learn and improve as competitors, I too learn and improve as a coach.

The Males
Aaron Chetek - Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Alex Netty - Illinois, USA
Bill Tillapaugh - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Bradley Parkinson - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Casey Brien - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Chip Thorndike - Florida, USA
Christopher Berry - California, USA
David Mullback - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
David Zeph - California, USA
Del Lafountain (Masters) - California, USA
Derek Robinson - Tennessee, USA
DJ Wickham - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Eric Cady - New York, USA
Fraser O'Neil - Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
Jake Naumchef - Alabama, USA
Jeff Flemming - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Joey Warren - California, USA
Jordan Kohn - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Josh Lewis - New York, USA
Kenneth Crowder - North, Carolina
Michael Coopman - Afghanistan
Michael Price - Dublin, Ireland
Michael McElroy - Mississippi, USA
Patrick Warker - Idaho, USA
Peter Demchuk - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Randy Getzinger - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Robert Corson (Masters) - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Ross Blake - Canberra, Australia
Scott Paltos - New Jersey, USA
Steve Sayhoun - Brisbane, Australia
Thomas Rech - Brisbane, Australia
Van Duffie - North Carolina, USA
Wes Hendricks - Washington, USA

The Females
Chelsea Ryan - California, USA
Christy Anderson - Strathmore, Alberta, Canada
Elisabeth Wagner (Masters) - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Jessica Tillapaugh - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Lauren Pryor - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Michelle Savard (Masters) - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Tiffany Wylie - Calgary, Alberta, Canada